Thursday, March 14, 2013

Hunters Auto Expo 2013



                The Tennessee State Fair grounds are kind of embarrassing.  The fault of years of mismanagement.  It is hardly fit to hold a fair to show off the best of the great State of Tennessee.  I wouldn’t think a great car show would be worth seeing here either.  This weekend I was pleasantly surprised by the Hunters Auto Expo.  Hunters is a Nashville based custom auto shop.  Want to make your ride unique? Want to know what is out there for your car? It doesn’t matter what you drive chances are Hunters has it.  The Auto Expo they sponsor is a great example of their diverse clientele.  It doesn’t matter what your definition of cool is, the expo has it.  Custom trucks, muscle cars, modern classics, and even some oddities are all parked next to each other in an indoor atmosphere.  It’s a state fair for car guys.  This blog I am going to keep short and fill it in with images from this year’s expo and I will be doing later blogs to go more in depth with some of my favorite cars and stories from the show.  As the summer approaches I also promise to take you along for some of the trips I take this year.  Please forgive the pictures, I am no professional.

Here Comes the Judge


Jack's Handy Work












Left Hand Drive Classic MINI




This is what I would have driven home in.  5.0 engine with modern wheels and brakes.
A great daily driver.


This Charger reminded me of the Panamera's interior.



This car deserved a second look.  Classic Camaro front and back with modern in the middle. Plus a Corvette power train.   
 






This car used to race at the dirt tracks of my home town.




A supercharge V6. I was highly impressed.










One Purple Challenger

A Second Purple Challenger












1976 Pontiac Can Am. I have never seen one and this one is amazing.


Before
After







Wednesday, February 13, 2013

The EPA is Failing Us



                Fuel is a four letter word.  Fuel economy can be a rude phrase in certain circles.  Everyone is talking about fuel economy numbers, even the president of The United States.  The EPA is the government agency responsible for monitoring and releasing fuel economy estimates for vehicles sold on these shores.  ‘Estimates’ being the most important word in their findings.  Normally cars get a city, highway, and overall estimate.  The government also regulates that car manufacturers have to reach a certain combined mpg within their fleet of sales.  This is called the CAFÉ standards.  It has nothing to do with coffee however.  If you think gas is expensive imagine if your car ran on Dunkin.  How seriously can we take these estimates?
                Lately Ford has come under some heat about their cars EPA mileage estimates.  Consumer Reports recently posted an article comparing Ford’s Ecoboost engines against some of Ford’s rivals.  Ford’s Ecoboost engines use turbo chargers on smaller displacement engines in order to receive higher gas mileage without sacrificing power.  The idea at least is a sound one.  Car buyers like extra power but government regulations aren’t going to allow for all cars to have V8s any longer.  Consumer Reports runs a very different test than the EPA in order to determine gas mileage.  CR claims their test is more in line with real world driving.  CR found that not only were standard sized, naturally aspirated engines from Nissan and Honda receiving better fuel numbers but they were also getting better acceleration than similar Fords.  Now part of this discrepancy comes from the weight advantage both the Nissan Altima and Honda Accord have over the Ford Fusion that CR was testing.  CR failed to mention this in their report.  One thing that bothers me about CR’s findings is the gap between their findings and that of the EPA. The EPA found that almost all the cars should have been getting better mileage.  Why the difference?
                Consumer Reports isn’t the only group of testers finding issues with Ford’s EPA numbers.  In a recent test of the Ford Fusion Hybrid by Car and Driver’s Csaba Csere (don’t ask me to pronounce it), he reported decent fuel economy numbers of the high 30’s mpg but nowhere near the EPA’s estimate of 47 combined mpg.  Johnny Lieberman found out the same thing when testing the new Ford C-Max Hybrid. He reported almost the same numbers as Car and Driver.  I don’t think Ford is lying when they are putting these numbers on new car stickers.  I think it is highly possible that they have found a loop hole in how the EPA determines fuel mileage.  Ford boasts how their hybrids are getting better EPA estimates than their competitors but those claims are not relating to the real world.  The problem does not fall to Ford but to the EPA who provides these numbers. 
                If the EPA is not accurate, then do we even need them to provide these figures to the public? I feel they could be doing more harm than good to the car buyer. This is an area that clearly the open market can handle.  We have more car reviewers and testers in the public realm than ever before. Plus car magazines and online bloggers take no tax dollars for their research.  CAFÉ standards also put on unnecessary strain on car manufacturers to provide a certain level of fuel economy.  Can the free market not decide for itself that we want better fuel economy?  CAFÉ standards are making Ford work the system to provide better numbers for the EPA instead of just making a better car on the road.  Dodge spun off the brand Ram so that Dodge’s overall fuel economy numbers would go up.  By making Ram trucks its own brand and not under the Dodge badge it makes the fuel economy numbers for the whole Dodge line up jump even though their cars actually achieve no better mpg.  That’s not better for the consumer it is just better for Dodge. 
                In a country that tries to outlaw trans fats because they are unhealthy and puts warning labels on cigarette boxes because apparently cigarette buyers don’t realize they are dangerous, I get that buyers aren’t making good decisions.  I feel like we should be smarter about how we shop not just for cars but for all products.  I believer car buyers want better mileage cars.  I also think car manufacturers want to provide those cars. I also feel that car manufacturers can make a profit on those cars.  I just think it is time to realize the government inclusion on this issue is foolhardy. 
               

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

The Autonomous Car



                Get in your car, close the door, put foot on brake, check mirrors, key in ignition, start engine, and then put in drive and go.  That is a typical start to any one person’s day.  Except that’s all about to change.   The autonomous vehicle is quickly becoming the idea from the future that is making it into the present.  A few years about Google received some publicity for having autonomous, self-driving cars in its fleet of plug in Priuses.  The idea is pretty simple.  Tell the GPS system where you want to go and the car will find the best route and take you there with no other input from the occupant. Audi has even more recently become the first automotive manufacturer to get state licensing to have self-driving cars on public roads in the state of Nevada.  An Audi TT even managed to drive itself up Pikes Peak.  Does this mean that driving ourselves around in our own vehicles is a thing of the past? And what about those of us that enjoy driving? Are we doomed to obey the wills of our machines?
                First, let’s answer why autonomous cars are being investigated as possible.   When the automobile was first conceived it was a small relatively slow moving machine.  Most the parts were from bicycles.  There was a chance in the event of an accident a driver could be thrown from the vehicle but it would more than likely just result in a few bumps and bruises.  The idea of a pedestrian being hit by one of these loud machines seems very unlikely.  Skip ahead over a century of development and modern cars are tanks.  Even the slowest new car sold in the United States today can easily accomplish speeds over 80mph and in fact there are few that don’t have the ability to hit 100 given the right amount of road.  Cars are also built today with large cages to protect the passengers from danger resulting in automobiles that weigh several tons.  As a result of the added weight, modern cars also need larger output from their drivetrains.  From an engineering standpoint we have hit a wall.  We cannot keep adding size to increase strength which then in turn makes cars more powerful because the more powerful heavier car becomes less safe in an accident or to pedestrians.  Car manufactures have realized this dilemma and they see that it’s the driver, not the machine, which is really the danger.  As long as a machine, any machine, is functioning properly it cannot make a mistake.  Humans make mistakes.  I have a great example from my local town news.  In my town recently an older woman drove her SUV all the way into a local chain restaurant’s front door.  She had mistaken the gas pedal for the brake pedal.  In this case there was only one injury.  Her husband sitting in the passenger seat was slightly injured.   However, one shutters to think what would have happened if she had crashed one minute earlier and a group of customers had been waiting in the lobby to be seated for Sunday lunch.  The results could have been the death of one or more people.  The drivers of today are a distracted bunch.  Too concerned about what is happening on their cell phones, or how their makeup looks, or just letting their mind wander instead of paying attention to the task at hand.  By taking the controls of the vehicle away from drivers, manufacturers believe they can make roadways safer and more productive. 
                If all cars on the road were autonomous, traffic could be kept at a minimum.  Computers could decide the fastest way to move the number of cars on the fastest paths to avoid congestion.  Human drivers are more interested in cutting people off and getting there first.  Cars equipped with this technology could even make corrections for drivers.  If a driver is not paying attention to an obstacle and attempts to avoid it too late, the computer would take over and auto-correct for the driver to avoid either under-correcting or over-correcting.  Everyone remains safer. 
                Yet, even with these advantages the controlling part of my personality is not convinced in this view of the future.  I feel many automotive enthusiasts will agree with me that they like having control of their vehicle.  I rarely even use cruise control.  I don’t like the feeling of something else directing my car.  I don’t enjoy automatic transmissions because I want to say what gear to be in even if I am wrong.  Insurance companies also have reasons to question this line of equipment in vehicles.  Autonomous cars can only diminish not eliminate car crashes.  Where does the blame go when there is a crash? The driver who was not alert enough to avoid another vehicle, or the on board computer that did too little to correct the actions the driver took?  
                I do want to make one compromise to automotive companies and government law makers.  Allow some of the car buying public to have these autonomous cars.  Let them be free from themselves and their dangerous habits.  Take away their licenses altogether if you like.  Then introduce a higher level of education and restrictions for those of us who want to drive our own vehicles.  I would gladly become certified to be allowed to drive 90mph on the interstate instead of 70.  I would feel safer knowing that only those with proper training and properly maintained vehicles were allowed to drive on the same roads that I am.  Under current laws and regulations the cars and roads are supposed to be safe but dangerous drivers negate these rules. 
                If you are an automotive enthusiast (car nut) like I am I know you do not want to lose your privilege to drive.  Driving is a joy for you and to me.  I do not want to see autonomous cars become a threat to that enjoyment because of the actions of the few.  If we like this cause to that of the gun lover we can organize safety training and proper regulation that only safe people would be allowed behind the wheel.   A gun in the wrong hands is dangerous of course but so is a car.  Our right to own and operate a car is not protected and that scares me more than anything.  


http://matchbin-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/public/sites/971/assets/3G8M_T1_13_13O_Charleys_2.jpg

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Lincoln Motor Company


                The automotive industry here in the United States has drastically changed in just a few years.  We are used to seeing models come and go but now it has become more and more common to see brands themselves close down.  We haven’t seen this exodus from the market since the Great Depression.   Chrysler itself looked dangerous of closing its doors completely.  General Motors lost many brands.  The once cash cow Hummer is gone.  The brand of the future, Saturn seems like a sad failed experiment.   Saab was sold off and at the moment I am writing is out of business.  Pontiac was done away with despite some strong offerings like the G8 sedan.  Ford Motor Company has looked the strongest in this bleak time due mostly to a strong European offering.  However, Ford is not immune and it too sold off Volvo, Jaguar, Land Rover, and super car maker Aston Martin.  Long time Ford owned brand Mercury was slowly put into the ground.  Now Ford is looking to possibly do the same to the Lincoln brand.

                This year Lincoln is pushing out a new ad campaign to bring more buyers into the leather seats of Lincoln.  Does this really have a chance to work?  There is no doubt a successful car brand needs a successful marketing plan.  But, that cannot be the only change to be made.  Currently the range of offerings from Lincoln are truly overprices luxury versions of Ford cars.  Make no mistake the new Ford cars are top of the line.  If you are looking to buy a new car you should stop by a Ford dealership.  Just stay away from anything with a Lincoln badge on it because you are over paying. 

                I cannot actually remember the last time I saw a new Lincoln and even thought “wow that’s an interesting car”.  All I see is a lot of badge engineering.   If Lincoln is to change their current image it will take more than a smart marketing ploy.  In the last decade Lincoln rival Cadillac has done much to improve its image from that of cars for retirees to drive under 45 miles per hour, to exciting and fresh cars that youthful buyers are drawn to.  How did they do it?   Well a big part of the credit goes to the Escalade which was being bought and shown off by countless hip-hop artists and professional athletes alike.  It was a correctly cool Cadillac that hadn’t been around since maybe Elvis drove a Cadillac. Cadillac also went racing.  In order to bring excitement to its new performance sedan the CTS, a racing program was built from scratch.  And when the CTS-V came out, all of sudden Cadillac was winning on the track and the showroom. 

                So should Lincoln go racings? Hardly.  It might work but I think the buyers have already seen that and they are smart enough to know they want something different.  Some have said Lincoln and Ford in general needs a rear wheel drive sedan in order to compete against European rivals like BMW.  Ford executives and leaders have stated the reason we won’t see a sedan like this because Ford is focused on fuel economy.  That’s what Lincoln needs to do.  Lincoln does offer hybrid versions of its line because the Ford counterparts the Lincolns are based on offer hybrids.  I think Lincoln needs to engineer a brand that is the most fuel efficient brand in the United States.  Lincoln isn’t going to be a best buy or the most luxurious brand but it could be the leader in fuel mileage.  This would require a lot of money invested into the brand but it would also show the buyers that Ford is serious about this. 

                  Lincoln will not survive without major change.  It cannot be just talk and overpriced Ford cars.  The buyers aren’t dumb.  Lincoln right now is a middle of the pack car brand if I am being nice.  In the automotive industry if you aren’t leading then you might as well be in last place.  Lincoln isn’t leading at anything right now.  If Ford wants to rebuild this brand and be known as the most fuel efficient company in the industry then make Lincoln the example.  If Lincoln was number 1 ahead of Toyota and ahead of Honda it would turn the industry on its head and prove to customers Lincoln will be for real from now on.